On February 28, 1986, Dharmasiri Pieris was leading a conference on Co-operative Policy at the Agricultural Research and Training Institute (ARTI) when he received an unexpected call from the President of Sri Lanka. This situation often caused unease, as one could not predict the reason behind such summons from the head of state.
Upon arriving at the President”s office, he learned that the President intended to appoint veteran politician Dr. W. Dahanayake as the Minister of Co-operatives, having previously promised him a Cabinet position. The President requested Pieris to separate the Ministry of Food and Co-operatives into two distinct entities, with Gamani Jayasuriya continuing as Minister of Food. Although Pieris had reservations about working closely with Dahanayake due to a prior disagreement, he was instructed to proceed with the changes.
One of Pieris”s concerns was that he might be assigned as Secretary to the new Ministry of Co-operatives, particularly since he had recently clashed with Dahanayake during a Parliamentary Consultative Committee meeting. Dahanayake had criticized Pieris”s Commissioner of Co-operative Development, leading to a heated argument between them. Despite this tension, the President insisted that Pieris would serve both ministries, assuring him that Dahanayake would need to collaborate with him.
Following the necessary administrative changes, Dahanayake took his oath on March 4, 1986. He humorously told the press that he would begin his duties promptly, playfully indicating he had nothing to share until he turned 100.
The establishment of the new ministry was done with minimal expenditure, as it was based within the existing premises of the Food Ministry. Pieris found himself managing the responsibilities of two ministers, navigating their busy schedules and ensuring smooth communication between them, particularly as Dahanayake”s constituency was located over 100 kilometers from Colombo.
Working with Dahanayake proved to be an intriguing experience. He requested that his office open at six in the morning as he preferred to start his day early. While he did not expect his staff to arrive at that hour, he wanted his office to be available for his use. Pieris noted that while Dahanayake could be stubborn and resistant to reason, their relationship improved over time.
In one instance, Dahanayake insisted on dissolving the Board of Directors of a Multi-purpose Co-operative Society, despite being informed by the Commissioner that he lacked the authority to do so. Pieris supported the Commissioner”s stance, which led to a confrontation with Dahanayake. Ultimately, the Minister”s order resulted in a court case, where the Supreme Court criticized Dahanayake”s actions as arbitrary, leading to the imposition of a fine against him.
This incident marked a turning point in their relationship. Dahanayake began to value Pieris”s advice and acknowledged his contributions publicly. On several occasions, he recognized Pieris”s role in securing significant loans for the Co-operative movement, illustrating the importance of trust and collaboration in public service. Dahanayake”s acknowledgment of Pieris”s efforts in Parliament highlighted the significance of mutual respect and recognition in fostering effective working relationships.
Reflecting on his experiences, Pieris emphasized the importance of integrity and diligence in public service. He advised fellow public servants to uphold their responsibilities, regardless of the challenges they may face, underscoring that genuine service ultimately leads to respect and recognition.
In conclusion, Pieris”s reflections provide valuable insights into the dynamics of public service, highlighting the necessity of maintaining professionalism and integrity, even amidst personal disagreements and challenges.
