Juan del Val, a writer known for his intelligence, independence, and humor, has recently been awarded the prestigious Planeta Prize. Despite not completing his formal education, del Val”s candid demeanor and disregard for public opinion resonate with many, including political figure Yolanda Díaz, who believes that impressive educational credentials should not be a prerequisite for effective political service.
This year, del Val”s literary achievements have garnered him more criticism than praise, with many expressing overt hostility toward him even before the publication of his latest work. The controversies surrounding literary awards often raise questions about their fairness and the standards by which they are judged. Critics argue that the primary goal of such awards should be to promote quality literature, enhance the appreciation for reading, and support the holistic education of individuals.
Concerns have been voiced about the potential dilution of literary standards, as some feel that popular trends can lead to awards being granted to works that lack substance or quality. These critics contend that the proliferation of poorly written narratives, sometimes referred to as “pulp,” undermines the integrity of literature. While del Val”s recent novel has yet to be read by some critics, there is apprehension regarding the implications of awarding a prize to a salaried author and the motivations behind such decisions.
Carmen Martínez-Fortún, a professor, emphasizes that the merit of a literary work should be the sole criterion for receiving accolades, regardless of the author”s background or the financial implications of the award-giving entity. She has only read del Val”s previous work, “Boca besada,” which she found to be entertaining but not particularly outstanding. She remains open to the possibility that his latest book could surpass her expectations, and she intends to form a more informed opinion upon its release.
