Deviana Dewi, a PhD candidate at Johns Hopkins University, reflects on the unique role that American universities play as leaders in knowledge and innovation. She notes that this has been a hallmark of the U.S. since the post-World War II era, largely due to significant government investment in university research driven by merit and minimal political interference.
In 1945, wartime science advisor Vannevar Bush was commissioned by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to write “Science, The Endless Frontier,” arguing that federal funding for basic research in universities was vital for national security, economic prosperity, and public welfare. This period saw an influx of global talent, particularly from Jewish exiles fleeing Nazi oppression, which significantly enhanced America”s scientific capabilities.
The U.S. has long been regarded as the “land of the free” and the “home of the brave,” with its citizens empowered to advocate for their values and causes. However, Dewi expresses concern about a current crisis of freedoms, values, and equal opportunities within the nation.
She emphasizes that freedom should not be equated to the ability to act solely on personal desires, as articulated by Pope John Paul II, who stated, “Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought.” This understanding necessitates a strong legal framework to guide ethical behavior and distinguish right from wrong.
Dewi cites historical figures like Theodore Roosevelt, who affirmed the equality of all individuals before the law. This relationship between freedom and the law creates a virtuous cycle where respect for law fosters the exercise of freedom, ultimately contributing to the common good.
She expresses alarm at the erosion of values that inform public discourse, particularly when political leaders claim immunity from legal accountability. Such behaviors undermine the rule of law and disrupt the necessary balance of power within democratic institutions.
Dewi reflects on her experiences engaging with peers outside of academia, finding that discussions on U.S. policy often devolve into partisan arguments rather than constructive debates. She highlights the danger of “whataboutism,” which diverts attention from pressing issues without addressing the underlying concerns.
In her view, the prioritization of loyalty—whether to family, friends, or political parties—should not come at the expense of justice and truth. Loyalty must be structured appropriately, with a commitment to ethical principles taking precedence over personal interests.
Amidst these challenges, Dewi is particularly disturbed by recent proposals targeting skilled foreign workers, such as a proposed fee for H-1B visas and the potential termination of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program. These measures threaten to stifle opportunities for international students and skilled workers, undermining the meritocratic values that have historically characterized the U.S. job market.
She argues that such policies are self-defeating and could lead highly skilled individuals to seek opportunities in countries with more favorable immigration policies, thereby weakening the U.S. economy.
Dewi calls on international students to voice their concerns to elected officials, emphasizing the importance of civic engagement in safeguarding democratic values. She believes that awareness of political issues is a privilege, and taking action is essential for fostering hope and change.
As the world approaches the Jubilee Year of 2025, Dewi envisions a future driven by hope and the courage to act on what is right. She aims to contribute to discussions on governance and development, drawing from her diverse background as a first-generation college student from Purwakarta, Indonesia.
